Wednesday, February 18, 2009

The health Provisions in the stimulus package and what it means to your practice

While I am trying to juggle between getting all my work done, and packing to prepare for our new office move, I had to find time during my non excising lunch and do a quick blog message.

Earlier this week president Obama signed the stimulus bill, so that meant that everything that is proposed for our healthcare is now law. But after spending two nights trying to read the healthcare section of the 1071-page American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, I still had a lot of questions to ask about what are we really getting, and how do the healthcare groups go about getting it. I even had more questions than the ones I started out with.


So, as I googled all my concerns and questions, I found articles that really put a negative spin on the new stimulus bill. I have read things about how the seniors in the US will face rationing, and how doctors will be influenced by the government. These articles could not be more wrong. It was important to really stay positive and make the best out of the assistance that healthcare has long needed to help the adoption of the technology that it most definitely needs. I found many of my answers in the following site Click Here.


The incentives proposed for the health professionals are payments of 15,000 to 18,000 dollars for the first year, 12,000 dollars for the second payment and on until the fifth and last payment of 2,000 dollars.

Things that will be potentially requested from health professionals in order to be eligible for the incentives:

  • Submission of claims with appropriate coding (such as a code indicating that a patient encounter was documented using certified EHR technology) ---This reminds us on how we reported on PQRI.
  • The use of Electronic Prescribing (e-Prescription, and this can be achieved with third party vendors, so you don’t have to change your EMR if it does not support it).
  • The ability to exchange / forward your patient medical data to “data repository” defined by the Secretary ( RHIOs and hospitals have implemented these types of data warehouse and can store any of the following (which one they will request is the million dollar question):

Electronic Referrals and Consultation

Electronic Lab Orders/Results

Electronic Prescription

Electronic Imaging of patients

Electronic medical history

Radiology reports

Discharge reports

  • Treatment plans
  • An attestation
  • A survey response

Since I am still reading the Healthcare section of the stimulus, I will continue on this blog in the next few weeks and describe some of the ways that small to mid practices can utilize to benefit from this.






StumbleUpon

Sunday, February 8, 2009

Obama’s push for digital health records and what I think its flavors should be

While our new administration is doing the right thing by pushing for the modernization of our healthcare system, it is important to have a plan that will work and motivate everyone in the healthcare industry.
In my view the 5 year timeframe that our government is looking at will be very short to accomplish EHR implementation and standardization, especially in the small to mid size medical groups. In working with some of these types of offices in the last 10 years, I realized that many of them have complex workflows, and many encompass diverse delivery systems while many still suffer from the lack of proper infrastructure (Backups, server hardware requirements, scanners, efaxing,…etc.).
It is important to note that, in order to overcome the daily challenges that these groups are faced with (small IT Budgets, lack of HIT knowledge, and few uncooperative providers, high software costs), the new administration will have to create a road map that will impose some standards and also still be flexible by having different flavors of the modernization plan.
The package that should be offered will offer different options for different models as shown below:

Small Size Practices

• The offering of a complete web based solution (PMS/EMR) that will eliminate having to make large IT hardware/software investment, and still allow the practice to have EHR. Which package is needed would be a another blog subject).
• An option for the practice to use an EMR package that has been certified and approved by a Healthcare body.
• Educate the practices of the advantages of medical data sharing.
• Strong financial incentives in form of tax breaks or grants to offset the costs of time spent in training, and other requirements to get the new system going.
• Appoint at the state level a body that does nothing but consult with the practices and make sure they are seeing the benefits of such a system.

Mid Size Practices

• Work with these groups and allow them to keep using their current systems to maintain their patient medical records. Since these are the groups that have long implemented successfully many of the EMR packages that are offered.
• Provide financial incentives if they choose to migrate to a new EMR package.
• Provide financial / technical assistance to interface these systems to a central data repository. Similar efforts have been seen working with RHIOs where there is a substantial amount of resources needed to accomplish this.

Community health systems and hospitals

• I think we can all agree here that based on many of the recent statistics that still a larger number of hospitals are using electronic health records. So, the need here would be to centralize or allow for data sharing with the central data repository.

The only thing that I would add is that the effort should be shared amongst government and non government entities. Many health groups have successfully implemented some sort of central data repository where information is being exchanged and shared. The government role should be to enforce the standards, and offer reward to those who take the initiative to get on board.
StumbleUpon